|
(click to access)
Be A Corporate Sponsor
Please Visit Our
Corporate Sponsors





3 Blogs Selected






Be
A Corporate Sponsor
(click to access)
EcoBizport
Home
State
Homepages
-Illinois
-Indiana
-Michigan
-Minnesota
-Ohio
-Other States
Blogs By WIMS
WIMS
Environmental News Blogs
-
White House News
-
Congressional News
|
|
|
WIMS - Waste
Information & Management Services, Inc. - WIMS
Innovative Environmental Information Services Since 1980 |
 |
|
Sample
Daily Environmental Briefing Report
Sample
Wednesday, June 21, 2012
© 2012.
Permission is granted for Internal, Same-Office Distribution
Only. |
What Makes Us
Different From The Other Guys?
- We always give you the direct links to
the source information!
- Our prices are
reasonable and affordable to the smallest business or firm
Sample Issue Below
(Michigan Users
Click here)
Now you can try this highly acclaimed
publication at no charge for the next 30 days -- better yet; when
your trial is over you'll be able to afford to continue it --
Just $US239/year!
30-days Free, No Obligation

Click here for your free trial
or
In This Issue
-- NATIONAL/INTERNATIONAL NEWS --
House Passes Controversial
Domestic Energy & Jobs Act; 248-163
U.S. Delegation Reports On Rio+20 Sustainable
Development Meeting
Senate Passes Farm Bill; 64-35
Barnes & Thornburg Alert On EPA's Proposed PM2.5
Standards
Statement On Progress Of Surface Transportation Bills
House Dems Support Action On Short-Lived Climate
Pollutants
Pacific Rivers Counsel v. US Forest Service
National /
International News
House Passes
Controversial Domestic Energy & Jobs
Act; 248-163 - Jun 21: The U.S.
House passed the Republican sponsored Domestic
Energy and Jobs Act (H.R.4480), a legislative
package comprised of a series of bills which they
say "aim to increase access to American energy
resources and prevent misguided federal policies
that will drive energy prices higher." [See
WIMS 6/7/12]. The bill passed largely along
party lines with a vote of 248-163, with 21
Representatives not voting. Nineteen Democrats
joined 229 Republicans to approve the bill.
Yesterday (June 20)
on the House Floor, Representative Fred Upton
(R-MI), Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce
Committee Chairman delivered a statement in support
of H.R.4480, saying in part, "The price of gasoline
and the unemployment rate both remain far too high,
and American families are struggling as a result.
That’s why I support H.R. 4480, the Domestic Energy
and Jobs Act, and I urge my colleagues to do the
same. This bill is truly a win-win -- the steps it
takes to expand supplies of affordable domestic
energy will create many jobs in the process.
“It’s no secret that I don’t see eye-to-eye
with President Obama on energy policy, but perhaps
the most inexplicable energy policy move this
administration has made was the June 2011 decision
to withdraw 30 million barrels of oil from the
Strategic Petroleum Reserve with no plan to replace
them. It is hard to understand why the President
would take oil from the nation’s emergency stockpile
while at the same time keeping off-limits the far
greater amounts beneath federally controlled lands
and offshore areas. It’s like a couple pawning their
wedding rings for cash while ignoring a major gold
discovery in their backyard. The amount of untapped
oil in areas kept out of reach by the Obama
administration is estimated to exceed the entire
Strategic Petroleum Reserve dozens of times over. .
."
Following approval
today,
Representative Cory Gardner’s (R-CO) sponsor of the
package of domestic energy production legislation,
said, "The package of seven bills enjoyed bipartisan
support in the House," and urged the United States
Senate to consider the legislation. He said, “There
is no reason for the United States Senate not to
consider the Domestic Energy and Jobs Act and send
it to President Obama’s desk this summer. The seven
bills in this package provide an opportunity for job
growth and energy security. These bipartisan pieces
of legislation make sure that we move forward on oil
and gas development in the western United States and
on federal lands, and that we take steps to ensure
our nation relies on American made energy, provided
by American jobs."
However, it is unlikely the
Democratically-controlled Senate will consider the
bill and the White House has already issued a
Statement of Administration Policy on the bill
saying that if the bill were presented to the
President, White House senior
advisors would recommend that he veto the bill [See
WIMS 6/19/12]. The White House said the
bill would, ". . .undermine the
Nation's energy security, roll back policies that
support the continued growth of safe and responsible
energy production in the United States, discourage
environmental analysis and civic engagement in
Federal decision-making, and impede progress on
important Clean Air Act (CAA) rules to protect the
health of American families. H.R. 4480 would
threaten energy security and broader national
security by attaching conditions to the drawdown of
the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) that could
hinder the President's ability to respond
appropriately and lawfully to a disruption in the
Nation's energy supply. . . H.R.
4480 also would reverse Administration oil and gas
leasing reforms that have established orderly, open,
efficient, and environmentally sound processes for
energy development on public lands. . ."
Bills included in
House-passed Domestic Energy and Jobs Act:
- Strategic Energy Production Act of 2012, H.R.
4480 (Rep. Cory Gardner, CO)
- Gasoline Regulations Act of 2012, H.R. 4471
(Rep. Ed Whitfield, KY)
- Planning for American Energy Act of 2012,
H.R.4381 (Rep. Scott Tipton, CO)
- Providing Leasing Certainty for American
Energy Act of 2012, H.R 4382 (Rep. Mike Coffman,
CO)
- Streamlining Permitting of American Energy Act
of 2012, H.R. 4383 (Rep. Doug Lamborn, CO)
- National Petroleum Reserve Alaska Access Act,
H.R. 2150 (Rep. "Doc" Hastings, WA)
- BLM Live Internet Auctions Act, H.R. 2752
(Rep. Bill Johnson, OH)
House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) said, "Today, the
House will pass the Domestic Energy & Jobs Act,
which will help create good-paying jobs by expanding
American energy production. This is the latest in a
series of more than 30 House-passed jobs bills that
have removed government barriers to economic growth
and stopped policies that are driving up gas prices.
I also want to be clear about something: House
Republicans want to get a highway bill done. We want
a bill, and our colleagues are working toward
producing a bill. We just want to make sure it’s a
bill that includes real reforms, to ensure that
taxpayer funds are paying for legitimate projects
that support economic activity -- not planting more
flowers and beautification projects around the
country. We also continue to support bipartisan,
job-creating initiatives like the Keystone
pipeline.”
House Democratic environmental leaders,
Representatives Ed Markey (D-MA) and Henry Waxman
(D-CA) indicated that they "denounced the bill as
yet another large-scale giveaway to oil companies by
House Republicans, who have established the most
anti-environmental and pro-oil company agenda in the
history of Congress." They said the bill would
transfer hundreds of thousands of square miles of
America’s public lands to oil companies, while
protecting the $4 billion in subsidies the biggest
oil companies receive from taxpayers each year."
Rep.
Markey, the Ranking Member of the Natural Resources
Committee said, "Republicans passed a bill that
would cede nearly all of America’s public lands to
oil companies within just a few short years, but
wouldn’t even allow a debate on wind, solar, and a
real ‘all of the above’ energy strategy. This debate
was a sham, this legislation is a scam, and the
American people need to know these are the ‘oil
above all’ policies that a Mitt Romney
administration would put into place. Rep. Waxman,
the Ranking Member of the Energy and Commerce
Committee said, “This bill is a stealth attack on
the Clean Air Act. It might be great news for big
oil, but it means more pollution for the American
people.” They said, while the bill will not be
considered further it, "contains a dangerous preview
of the policies that would be implemented if Mitt
Romney and Republicans retake the White House and
Congress."
The
American Petroleum Institute’s (API) Executive Vice
President Marty Durbin applauded the House action
saying, "Greater access to domestic energy resources
combined with smarter policies that boost our
refining industry will benefit consumers in the long
run. More home grown energy is good for all
Americans. . . The legislation would establish an
‘all the above’ energy program for federal lands
that would open up more areas for energy production
while streamlining the permitting process. . . KXL
[Keystone XL pipeline] will put thousands of
Americans to work. It has and continues to be one of
the greatest shovel-ready projects awaiting
approval. We urge the transportation conferees to
include the Keystone provision in the final Highway
bill agreement. Unemployment remains high, now is
not the time to deny good paying energy jobs. We
cannot have regulations that are solutions in search
of a problem. Consumers should be informed about the
costs certain regulations have on the price of
producing gasoline and diesel.”
Sierra Club issued a
statement saying, "John Boehner and his House
Republicans have regurgitated Big Oil’s playbook and
called it a jobs plan. If you’re looking for an
example of why Congress’ approval rating is dipping
to all-time lows, look no further. This disgraceful
legislation is just their latest attempt to put oil
above all -- especially the needs of American
families. While Americans are paying more for gas,
House Republicans are more concerned about coddling
Exxon and BP and forking over our public lands for
more drilling and destruction. While families are
struggling to make ends meet, Boehner and his ilk
are turning over billions in tax giveaways to
companies already making record profits. If we’ve
learned one thing this Congress it’s that House
Republicans are asking ‘how high?’ before Big Oil
even asks them to jump.”
Access the floor
statement and video from Rep. Upton (click
here). Access a release from Rep.
Gardner (click
here). Access the statement and video from
Speaker Boehner (click
here). Access the joint release from Reps.
Markey and Waxman (click
here). Access the statement from Sierra
Club (click
here). Access the statement from API (click
here). Access the floor consideration and
amendment votes for H.R.4480 (click
here). Access the roll call vote details (click
here). Access the Policy Statement for
H.R.4480 (click
here). Access legislative details for
H.R.4480 (click
here). [#Air, #Energy]
U.S. Delegation Reports On Rio+20
Sustainable Development Meeting - Jun 19:
Todd Stern, U.S. Special Envoy on Climate Change,
serving as chief negotiator at the UN Conference on
Sustainable Development -- Rio+20 -- taking place
June 20-22 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil held a
teleconference press briefing on June 19, following
preliminary negotiations on the "outcome document."
In brief summary, Stern reported:
"I think the outcome that we finish today will
help advance goals in this area. It is a
negotiated outcome, a negotiated document with a
lot of different views from a lot of different
players. So, it obviously isn’t everything to
everybody. I think everybody here — I think
Minister Patriota mentioned this — everybody had
things they were more pleased about and less
pleased about, and certainly some things could
have been improved, but I think it was a good
strong step forward.
"We have done some important things
institutionally, including significantly
strengthening UNEP in the UN system, also
establishing a new high-level forum on sustainable
development in the UN in New York focusing on a
variety of ways to manage our vital natural
resources more effectively and efficiently. And I
think all of these things will not in any sense by
themselves-but we hope push in a direction where
sustainable development proceeds and we more and
more have the ability, as was first discussed in
the 1987 Brundtland Report, to meet the needs of
the present without compromising the ability of
future generations to meet their needs. And that
is a nice kind of summary of what sustainable
development is all about.
"Just one other brief comment. I've been
focusing on negotiations along with my team. While
we've been doing that, there has been a heck of a
lot of other stuff going on in Rio. This
conference is about much more than the negotiated
text. We have seen the emergence of new
public-private partnerships like the Corporate
Sustainability Forum showcasing private sector
innovation. There have been all sorts of
gatherings of civil society, private sector
leaders. There have been sustainable development
dialogues, which I saw occasionally on the screens
when I was walking from one building to the next,
and I kind of wished that I could be in one or two
of those. There has been a lot going on. There is
a lot that is going to continue to go on the next
few days, and while I am not the best spokesman to
talk about all of those things since I've been on
the negotiating front, I think they're terribly
important and it looks to me quite impressive.
In a separate release from the U.S.
delegation, the U.S. announced its support for the UN
Secretary General’s Sustainable Energy for All
(SE4ALL) initiative. The release indicates that the
SE4ALL initiative "represents an important opportunity
for the international community to address issues
critical to the future of sustainable development,
energy access, and economic growth. Expanding the use
of efficient and clean energy technologies is a
priority of the Obama Administration, domestically and
internationally, and increasing energy access is a
central challenge facing the world.
"The United States supports the principles of
the Global Action Agenda developed by the SE4ALL
High Level Group through existing and planned
activities across a broad range of U.S. Government
agencies. As reported elsewhere in official
documents, the U.S. is providing substantial grant,
loan and loan guarantee resources, from both
Congressionally-appropriated funds and under loan
and loan guarantee authorities, of about $2 billion
in FY11 for clean energy. The Administration looks
forward to working with the Congress on activities
in FY12 that will build on and sustain this USG
priority. These funds are helping to create a sound
policy, regulatory and institutional framework for
project investment and financing from private and
international sources as well as directly leveraging
investment. Support for innovation and energy
technology partnerships is also an important focus.
In building viable and sustainable energy markets,
U.S. support helps create opportunities for American
exports in renewable energy, power generation and
energy efficiency technologies." The release
provides a listing of specific examples of on-going
and planned U.S. Government support for the SE4All
Global Action Agenda.
Access the complete press
teleconference (click
here). Access the release on the U.S. support
for the SE4ALL initiative (click
here). Access the draft outcome document that
will be finalized at the Rio+20 meeting (click
here). Access the SE4ALL website for more
information (click
here). Access document, issue briefs, daily
journals and more (click
here). Access the State Department Rio+20
website for more information (click
here). Access the EPA Rio+20 website (click
here). Access events at the US Center which
are being live streamed (click
here). Access the Rio+20 website for complete
details (click
here). Access more information on Rio+20 (click
here). [#Sustain, #Climate, #Energy]
Senate Passes Farm Bill; 64-35 - Jun 21:
The U.S. Senate plodded its way through amendments
to the Farm Bill, S.3240, and a final vote of
approval occurred just a short time ago. The bill
passed with a vote of 64-35. The House has not yet
passed a Farm Bill. On June 18, Senator Debbie
Stabenow, Chairwoman of the U.S. Senate Committee on
Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, and sponsor of
the bill issued a statement regarding the bipartisan
agreement on over 70 amendments that will allow the
Senate to move forward with Farm Bill.
She
said, “This bill was developed through bipartisan
collaboration, passed committee with broad
bipartisan support, and we now have a bipartisan
agreement to move forward with a bill that affects
16 million American jobs. My colleagues on both
sides of the aisle understand we must act as soon as
possible to give farmers the certainty they need to
keep growing the economy. This Farm Bill is unlike
any other before it -- it cuts spending, ends
subsidies, improves accountability and strengthens
healthy food systems. We are now closer than ever to
achieving real reform in America’s agriculture
policy.”
Today (June 21) the Senate considered the following
roll call votes requiring 60 votes to be approved.
Toomey #2247 (paperwork); Sanders #2310 (genetically
engineered food); Coburn #2214 (convention funding);
Boxer #2456 (aerial inspections); Johanns #2372
(aerial inspections); Rubio #2166 (RAISE Act); and
Passage of S.3240, the Farm bill, as amended. Thus
far, the Johanns and Boxer amendments, relating to
aerial surveillance to inspect
agricultural operations, have been rejected.
Additionally, the Toomey, Sanders, and
Rubio amendments were rejected. The Coburn amendment
was approved.
Access the Senate roll call votes on recent Farm
Bill amendments ( click
here). [ Note: the final vote on
approval of the bill will be posted soon]. Access
a listing of the amendments that were considered
today and links to further details ( click
here). Access a listing of amendments
previously considered and the outcome of their
consideration ( click
here). [#Access the legislative details for
S.3240 ( click
here). [#Agricultue, #Land, #Water,
#Energy]
Barnes & Thornburg Alert On EPA's Proposed
PM2.5 Standards - Jun 20: Barnes &
Thornburg LLP (BTLaw), one of the WIMS corporate
sponsors, has issued an Environmental Law Alert on
U.S. EPA's proposal to strengthen the PM2.5 fine
particulate matter standard [ See
WIMS 6/18/12]. The Alert indicates that,
"On June 15, 2012, U.S. EPA proposed stricter
standards to the National Ambient Air Quality
Standards (NAAQS) under the Clean Air Act for fine
particulate matter. The proposed rule, which is the
result of a lawsuit in the U.S. Court of Appeals in
the Washington D.C Circuit brought by environmental
groups and certain states, proposes to tighten the
annual standard for particulate matter under 2.5
microns (PM 2.5) from 15 micrograms per cubic meter
(ug/m3) (the 2006 standard) to between 12 and 13 ug/m3.
The rule also proposes a new separate standard for
improving visibility in urban areas of either 28 to
30 'deciviews,' a measurement of visibility. The
proposed rule and 'fact sheets' provided by the
Agency make clear that EPA is not proposing a change
to the existing 24-hour and secondary standards for
fine and course particulate matter set in 2006.
"EPA
claims that the new standard will come at an annual
cost of between $2.9 million and $69 million
(depending upon a final standard of 12 or 13 ug/m3),
but claims these costs are outweighed by alleged
health benefits of $220 million to $5.9 billion. EPA
is also claiming that all but six counties in the
United States should be able to meet the new
standards without additional action. However, San
Bernadino and Riverside Counties in California,
Santa Cruz County in Arizona, Wayne County in
Michigan, Jefferson County in Alabama, and Lincoln
County in Montana - are all expected to need to
reduce fine particulate emissions to attain the new
standards.
"Under
state and federal Clean Air Act regulations,
counties that are out of attainment with the NAAQs
can be subject to special 'Retro-active Control
Technology' (RACT) requirements, and new sources of
fine particulate emissions will need to obtain
'offsets' prior to construction among other
requirements. In addition to the new proposed
standards, EPA is also proposing changes to
monitoring requirements for fine particulate matter
including the addition of fine particulate ambient
air monitors especially along urban highways."
Barnes & Thornburg LLP
notes that, "EPA's proposed rule comes during an
election year and is expected to draw broad
criticism from Republicans and industry groups.
Environmental groups are already praising the new
proposed lower standards." The new proposed rule has
not yet been published in the Federal Register. Comments
on the new proposed rule are due within 63 days of
publication in the Federal Register.
Access the complete
BTLaw Environmental Alert (click
here). Access the a release from EPA with
links to a map showing counties in attainment in
2020 and more information including the proposed
rule, fact sheets and support documents (click
here). Access the BTLaw environmental
practice website for further information (click
here).
[#Air,
#MIAir]
Statement On Progress Of Surface
Transportation Bills - Jun 21: Senator
Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Chairman of the Environment
and Public Works Committee, and Representative John
Mica (R-FL), Chairman of the Transportation and
Infrastructure Committee, issued a brief statement
regarding the surface transportation bill that is
currently stalled in Conference Committee [See
WIMS 6/20/12].
The
two said, "The conferees have moved forward toward a
bipartisan, bicameral agreement on a highway
reauthorization bill. Both House and Senate
conferees will continue to work with a goal of
completing a package by next week."
There are substantial differences between the
two versions of the reauthorization of the Highway
Surface Transportation program remain at a political
standstill. The House version, H.R.4348, the Surface
Transportation Extension Act of 2012, provides a
short-term extension and includes highly
controversial provisions requiring approval of the
Keystone XL pipeline and the management and reuse of
coal ash. The Senate version, S.1813, the Moving
Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21),
provides a two-year $109 billion surface
transportation reauthorization and passed the Senate
with 74 votes. The Conference Committee held their
first meeting on May 8 [ See
WIMS 5/09/12]. Funding for the Surface
Transportation program which was set to expire on
March 31, was extended 90-days to June 30 [ See
WIMS 3/30/12].
Access the statement (click
here). Access legislative details for
H.R.4348 (click
here).
Access legislative details for S.1813 (click
here). [#Transport]
House Dems Support Action On Short-Lived Climate
Pollutants - Jun 19: House Energy and
Commerce Committee Ranking Member Henry Waxman (D-CA),
Natural Resources Committee Ranking Member Edward
Markey (D-MA), and Foreign Affairs Committee Ranking
Member Howard Berman (D-CA) praised Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton for her work on calling international
attention to addressing short-lived climate pollutants
[See
WIMS 6/4/12] and urged her to focus on the
issue at the G20 Summit in Mexico and to make progress
at the Montreal Protocol’s Meeting of the Parties in
November.
In the
letter, the members wrote, “Climate change is an
enormous challenge. We appreciate your dedication to
addressing this problem and look forward to working
with you to harness the full potential of the Montreal
Protocol and the Climate and Clean Air Coalition to
help meet this challenge.”
Their letter indicates, "Unlike carbon dioxide,
which remains in the atmosphere for millennia,
short-lived climate pollutants have a relatively
short lifetime in the atmosphere of a few days to a
few decades. Yet they are responsible for nearly
half of current global warming. As a result, cutting
short-lived climate pollution can significantly
reduce the current rate of global warming,
particularly in the Arctic, where it can reduce the
rate of warming by an estimated two-thirds in the
next thirty years. Implementation of measures to cut
emissions of short-lived climate pollutants has the
potential to reduce the planetary warming expected
by 2050 by half a degree Celsius. Such action would
substantially reduce the risk of crossing the
dangerous threshold of more than two degrees Celsius
(3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) of global warming. Because
ground-level ozone and black carbon also harm human
health and agriculture, emissions reductions could
save millions of lives each year and increase annual
crop yields by tens of millions of tons. . ."
On June 3, Secretary of State Clinton addressed
the participants at the second formal meeting of the
international coalition -- the Climate and Clean Air
Coalition (CCAC) -- to address the subject of
short-lived climate pollutants or SLCPs, held in
Stockholm, Sweden which has grown from six to 16
countries, plus the European Commission, UNEP, and
the World Bank. She said SLCPs ". . .are responsible
for more than 30 percent of current global warming.
And because they are also very harmful to human
health and to agriculture, we can save millions of
lives and tons of crops as well by acting now. This
is what we call a win-win for sure. . ."
Access a release and the complete letter ( click
here). Access the address by Secretary
Clinton ( click
here). Access the CCAC website ( click
here). [#Climate, #Air]
Pacific Rivers Counsel v. US Forest Service
- Jun 20: In the U.S. Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit, Case No. 08-17565.
Appeal from the
United States District Court
for the Eastern District of
California. The Appeals Court indicates that, "This
court’s opinion filed on February 3, 2012, and
reported at 668 F.3d 609 (9th Cir. 2012) [See
WIMS 2/6/12], is withdrawn, and is replaced
by the attached Opinion and Dissent. . . The full
court has been advised of the petition for rehearing
en banc and no judge of the court has requested a
vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. . .
The petition for rehearing and the petition for
rehearing en
banc, filed on
April 18, 2012, are denied."
According to the Appeals
Court,
Plaintiff-Appellant Pacific
Rivers Council (Pacific Rivers) brought suit in
Federal district court challenging the 2004
Framework for the Sierra Nevada Mountains (the
Sierras) as inconsistent with the National
Environmental
Protection Act (NEPA) and the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The Appeals
Court said, "The gravamen of Pacific Rivers’
complaint is that the 2004 EIS does not sufficiently
analyze the environmental consequences of the 2004
Framework for fish and amphibians." On cross-motions
for summary judgment, the district court granted
summary judgment to the Forest Service.
The Appeals Court rules,
"Pacific Rivers timely appealed the grant of summary
judgment. For the reasons that follow, we conclude
that the Forest Service’s analysis of fish in the
2004 EIS does not comply with NEPA. However, we
conclude that the Forest Service’s analysis of
amphibians does comply with NEPA. We therefore
reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand to the
district court."
In a lengthy dissenting opinion, one Justice
concludes, ". . .the
majority makes two fundamental errors: First, it
reinvents the arbitrary and capricious standard of
review, transforming it from an appropriately
deferential standard to one freely allowing courts
to substitute their judgments for that of the
agency. . .
Second, the majority ignores the
tiering framework created by NEPA. Because the
majority ignores such framework, it fails to
differentiate between a site-specific environmental
impact statement (EIS) and a programmatic EIS that
focuses on high-level policy decisions. . ."
Access the
complete opinion and dissent (click
here). [#Land, #Water, #Wildlife, #CA9]
Federal
Register Highlights
The following is a summary from our
Daily REGTrak Bulletin* for:
Thursday, June 21, 2012.
Federal
Register
Vol. 77,
Issue 120
1. AIR -
PR/NM/Comment Extension. EPA. National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal
Combustion Engines; New Source
Performance Standards for Stationary
Internal Combustion Engines PDF | Text |
2. AIR - NS. EPA.
Proposed Settlement Agreement; Re:
National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for
Reciprocating Internal Combustion
Engines (the RICE NESHAP) PDF | Text
|
3. ENERGY/Pipeline -
NM. DOT/PHMSA. Pipeline Safety: Notice
of Public Workshop To Discuss
Implementing Incorporation by Reference
Requirements of Section 24 of the
Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty,
and Job Creation Act of 2011 PDF | Text
|
__________________________________
ANPR
- Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking;
FR - Final
Rule; FRD - Direct
final rule; FRI -
Interim final rule; ICR
- Information Collection Request;
ND - Notice of
data, information, reports, etc. availability;
NF - Notice of
Funding Opportunity; NM
- Notice of Meeting; NS
- Notice of administrative/court settlement;
PR - Proposed Rule;
ROD - Record of
decision
*If
you need further information on the above
announcements you may want to subscribe to our
REGTrak service. Subscribers receive a complete
Federal Register summary of nationally
applicable environmental announcements, contact
information and direct links to the full-text of
each announcement (pdf & html) before 8 AM each
day for $139 per year (click
here). You can
also access our Federal Regulatory website and
follow the links from there (click
here).
Article Coding: [Air]
= Air; [All] = Cross-Media, ecosystems;
[Climate] Climate Change; [Drink] = Drinking
Water; [Energy] = Energy; [GLakes] = Great
Lakes; [Haz] = Hazardous Waste; [Land] = Land
Use, Forests; [P2] Pollution Prevention,
Sustainability; [Remed] = Remediation,
Brownfields; [Tanks] = AST, UST; [Toxics]
=Toxics, Pesticides; [Transport] =
Transportation; [Solid Waste]; [Water] = Water;
[Wildlife] = Wildlife, Endangered Species.
eNewsUSA
is produced each business day (46
weeks/year, some exceptions) and is available on a subscription
basis for $239/year. All issues are archived at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/enusa.
Copyright © 2012. Permission is
granted for Internal, Same-Office, Distribution Only. Michigan
interests should review
WIMS Daily
which provides additional information specific to Michigan.
............................................................................................................................
30-days Free, No Obligation

Click here for your free trial
or
eNewsUSA
is produced each business day (46
weeks/year, some exceptions) and is available on a
subscription basis for $239/year.
Send inquiries to
info@ecobizport.com.
|
|